+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 24.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:29.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:53.8%(+24.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:29.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:53.8%(+24.4%)
Providers:9