+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:87.4%(+7.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:80.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:87.4%(+7.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:80.2%
Providers:0