+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 16.9% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:87.3%(+16.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:70.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:87.3%(+16.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:70.4%
Providers:1