+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 9.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
3 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:77.4%(+9.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:67.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:77.4%(+9.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:67.9%
Providers:5