+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 1.8% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
1 month newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:87.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:89.1%(+1.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:87.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:89.1%(+1.8%)
Providers:9