+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 33.3% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Average performance across 39 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:18.9%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:52.1%(+33.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:18.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:52.1%(+33.3%)
Providers:0