+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 20.1% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
12 days newer
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:87.4%(+20.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:67.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:87.4%(+20.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:67.3%
Providers:0