+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 48.3% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:66.9%(+48.3%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:18.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:66.9%(+48.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:18.6%
Providers:0