+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:87.4%(+12.3%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:75.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:87.4%(+12.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:75.1%
Providers:4