+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi-k1.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 235B A22B is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K1.5 was developed by Moonshot AI as an advanced language model with extended context capabilities, designed to handle long documents and conversations. Built to excel at tasks requiring comprehension of extensive information, it represents Moonshot's approach to long-context language understanding.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
3 months newer
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:82.5%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:86.8%(+4.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:82.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:86.8%(+4.3%)
Providers:4