+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 0905 vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 18.1% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 268.3K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $2.35 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
11 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($2.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:85.0%(+18.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:66.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:85.0%(+18.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:66.9%
Providers:5