Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 28.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.5M more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 0905. Llama 4 Maverick is $2.33 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Kimi K2 0905
Llama 4 Maverick
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
Kimi K2 0905
Llama 4 Maverick
Available providers and their performance metrics
Kimi K2 0905
Novita
ZeroEval
Llama 4 Maverick
Kimi K2 0905
Llama 4 Maverick
Kimi K2 0905
Llama 4 Maverick
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Sambanova
Together