+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 0905 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 19.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.5M more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 0905. Llama 4 Scout is $2.72 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
5 months newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($2.72 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:84.4%(+19.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:65.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:84.4%(+19.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:65.3%
Providers:6