+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 0905 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 22.2% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 268.3K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $2.80 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($2.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:90.2%(+22.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:90.2%(+22.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2