+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 0905 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 23.0% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:36.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:59.0%(+23.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:36.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:59.0%(+23.0%)
Providers:0