+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 0905 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 268.3K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $2.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
4 months newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($2.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:72.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:81.4%(+9.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:72.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:81.4%(+9.4%)
Providers:3