+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.2% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in C-Eval (92.5%), GSM8k (92.1%), MMLU-redux-2.0 (90.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:32.1%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:48.0%(+15.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:32.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:48.0%(+15.9%)
Providers:9