+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 16.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:68.7%(+16.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:52.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:68.7%(+16.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:52.6%
Providers:6