+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 19.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:74.6%(+19.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:55.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:74.6%(+19.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:55.5%
Providers:1