+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 1.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:68.7%(+1.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:66.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:68.7%(+1.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:66.9%
Providers:5