+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Base vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 7.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:66.0%(+7.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:58.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:66.0%(+7.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:58.9%
Providers:0