+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 29.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
11 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:82.3%(+29.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:52.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:82.3%(+29.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:52.9%
Providers:6