+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 49.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 38 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), GSM8k (97.3%), CBNSL (95.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 41 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:61.8%(+49.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:12.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:61.8%(+49.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:12.3%
Providers:0