+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 25.1% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $2.84 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($2.84 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:87.9%(+25.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:62.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:87.9%(+25.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:62.8%
Providers:1