+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 16.0% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $2.12 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
9 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($2.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:82.3%(+16.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:66.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:82.3%(+16.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:66.3%
Providers:5