+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $2.47 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
7 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($2.47 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:85.8%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:77.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:85.8%(+8.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:77.2%
Providers:9