+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 3.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 Instruct. Llama 4 Maverick is $2.10 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
3 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($2.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:81.9%(+3.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:78.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:81.9%(+3.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:78.6%
Providers:7