+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 47.2% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 38 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), GSM8k (97.3%), CBNSL (95.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 45 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:56.3%(+47.2%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:9.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:56.3%(+47.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:9.1%
Providers:0