+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:74.0%(+15.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:58.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:74.0%(+15.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:58.4%
Providers:0