+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 2.4% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 37.9K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 Instruct. Kimi K2 Instruct is $72.13 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
6 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30($72.13 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:75.5%(+2.4%)
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:73.0%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Coding71.6%(+30.6%)
+
+
+
+
o1
Coding41.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
o1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:75.5%(+2.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:73.0%
Providers:2