+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 38 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), GSM8k (97.3%), CBNSL (95.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 64 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:39.6%(+7.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:31.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:39.6%(+7.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:31.8%
Providers:0