+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 18.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 230.1K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $2.66 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
7 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($2.66 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:76.6%(+18.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:58.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:76.6%(+18.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:58.2%
Providers:1