+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 23.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 126.0K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $2.57 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
9 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($2.57 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:90.9%(+23.4%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:67.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:90.9%(+23.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:67.5%
Providers:1