+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 13.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $2.69 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
9 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($2.69 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:90.8%(+13.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:77.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:90.8%(+13.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:77.4%
Providers:4