+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 13.6% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:84.8%(+13.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:71.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:84.8%(+13.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:71.2%
Providers:0