+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Kimi K2 Instruct vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $2.47 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
2 months newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($2.47 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:65.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:76.4%(+11.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
Latency: 0.95ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:65.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:76.4%(+11.2%)
Providers:3