+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 40.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:62.0%(+40.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:22.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:62.0%(+40.0%)
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:22.0%
Providers:0