+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 20.1% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
10 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:50.7%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+20.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:50.7%
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+20.1%)
Providers:0