+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 40.6% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:57.0%(+40.6%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:16.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:57.0%(+40.6%)
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:16.4%
Providers:0