+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 19.3% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $1.48 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
5 days newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input:$0.89
Output:$0.89
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($1.48 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:87.3%(+19.3%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:87.3%(+19.3%)
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2