+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $73.22 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input:$0.89
Output:$0.89($73.22 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:79.5%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:90.3%(+10.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:79.5%
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:90.3%(+10.8%)
Providers:2