+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 10.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), GSM8k (83.9%), MBPP (83.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:46.0%(+10.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:35.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:46.0%(+10.5%)
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:35.5%
Providers:0