+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 18.2% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is $1.38 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
9 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input:$0.89
Output:$0.89
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($1.38 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:88.5%(+18.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:70.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 27 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 78 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Hyperbolic
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:88.5%(+18.2%)
Providers:8
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:70.3%
Providers:3