Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs QwQ-32B - AI Comparison for Builders | airank.dev

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs QwQ-32B

Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 41.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.

Meta

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (96.9%), GSM8k (96.8%), API-Bank (92.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 8 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.

7 months newer

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Average performance across 22 common benchmarks

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Average Score:64.8%(+41.1%)

QwQ-32B

Average Score:23.7%

Knowledge Cutoff

Training data recency comparison

QwQ-32B

2024-11-28

More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

8 providers

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s

Latency: 0.5ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 27 tok/s

Latency: 0.5ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 78 tok/s

Latency: 0.5ms

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s

Latency: 0.4ms

Hyperbolic

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Avg Score:64.8%(+41.1%)

Providers:8

QwQ-32B

Avg Score:23.7%

Providers:0