+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 29.1% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
10 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:41.7%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+29.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 1204 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 25 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 32 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:41.7%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+29.1%)
Providers:0