+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 2.4% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
7 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:70.4%(+2.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 1204 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 25 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 32 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:70.4%(+2.4%)
Providers:0