Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 20.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers 119.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.8% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (90.7%), ChartQA (81.8%), VQAv2 (78.6%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Pixtral-12B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Pixtral-12B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Pixtral-12B
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Pixtral-12B
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI