Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 6.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
1 month newer

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Together