Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda