+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 10.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
8 months newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:62.9%(+10.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:52.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 1204 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 25 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 32 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:62.9%(+10.7%)
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:52.2%
Providers:0